Friday, February 26, 2010

Vote for Gregory and Jonathan: A Love That Beat the Odds

Click on the link below and VOTE for these guys!

http://ultimateweddingcontest.com/entries/22682?sort=votes#22682



Our love story.

Boy meets boy, boy falls for boy, and boys get engaged. The pure existence of our love is not always accepted. We had to deal with hatred from outsiders and support one another in recovery. Our love story involves the evolution of the meaning of love and the perseverance that allowed two people such as us to openly experience happiness. We knew that we were right for each other from the start, we knew that we would always be by one another’s sides and that as best friends we could truly experience our love openly.

Three important details about our Ultimate Wedding.

The three key things for our wedding are simply friends, family, and fun. We want a simple, but elegant affair at an outdoor vineyard in the DC area with our family and friends from across the country. Our family and friends are very important to us and our dream day would not be complete unless we were surrounded by all of them. And we want all of these people to be able to celebrate our love for each other and enjoy a memorable occasion.

Our everyday dream day.

Beauty, tranquility, and love characterize our perfect day. A perfect day for us is a day that is very similar to our wedding day. It is a day that we are free to spend together and to enjoy the company of our friends and family. One of our favorite weekend pastimes is venturing out to the vineyards in Virginia with a small group for a wine tasting and picnic. It gives us the opportunity to enjoy each others company, be absorbed by our surroundings and get away from the hectic lives we lead in the city.

leftwingconspiracy.com


I love this blog!




Dems need to grow some hair on their balls and PUSH for reconciliation and stop this ass kissing with the party of NO.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Demand To Be Part Of The Census.




The census tells the story of who we are as a nation, and that includes LGBT people — but only when we participate, and only when we're fully counted. Thanks to the collection of unmarried partner data, a more complete picture of who we are has emerged. For example, we know that:

  • Same-sex couples live in 99% of all US Counties.
  • LGBT parents live in 97% of all US Counties.
  • Black and Latino same-sex couples are raising children at almost the same rates as their heterosexual peers, but on lower incomes ($10,000/yr less).

Still, there is no question on the 2010 census that asks individuals if they are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender — and LGBT questions are not included in almost all other major federal surveys.

It's a big problem. The census, which counts everyone living in the United States every ten years, provides the data that is used to determine funding and policy priorities at the national and state level.

Being counted isn’t just a numbers game, but a question of whether the LGBT community gets access to the resources that support our health, economic well-being, safety and families. The LGBT community must be visible--and that means participating in the census, but it also means being counted fully.

That's why the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, together with CREDO Action, has launched Queer the Census. We must ensure that LGBT people are accurately counted in the next census — and we need your help to make it happen. Here's how:

  1. Sign the petition to the right to pledge your support of a census that counts everyone!

  2. Get the Queer the Census sticker and use it to seal the back of your census envelope.

  3. Spread the word about the Queer the Census campaign.

  4. Make a contribution to support the campaign.

Thank you so much for your efforts to help Queer the Census and ensure that everyone is counted!


http://www.queerthecensus.org/c.jeJLIVOxEnH/b.5497239/k.357A/Queer_the_Census__Spread_the_Word/siteapps/email/spreadWord.aspx

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Jake Gyllenhaal : Drop Dead Hunk Of The Month. Feb -2010




With all the HOT men out there I can't understand why People magazine has to keep recycling previous winners of their " Sexist Man Alive " list. I've been doing this list for a while and so far there isn't any shortage of men to spotlight. Everyone has a HOT list of something and mine is gorgeous hot masculine men that offer more than just a pretty face. As you can see there is no particular type, straight or gay men make the list though I would never include guys that are homophobes or the typical plastic Hollywood types.
Nothing is sexier than a masculine guy who is comfortable in his own skin and has no problem having a gay following and Jake
Gyllenhaal epitomizes that statement more than any other. Besides being a great artist he is one sexy guy with a smile that can melt the glaciers.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Now This Is The Obama I Love and Voted For.






I've been pretty critical of President Obama, including his state of the union address but yesterday's meeting in Baltimore with GOP Congressmen from the House of Representatives reaffirmed why I voted for the man.
Truly one of the most incredible political smack downs I have ever seen. The party of NO shows their true colors for what they are...OBSTRUCTIONIST.


One small request Mr President can you please show this same type of leadership concerning discrimination in the military and END DADT

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The New Civil Rights Movement by David Badash

One of the most informative and interesting blogs I have ever read. It's truly a must read.

Post image for DADT: Mr. President, It’s Actually “Don’t Ask,  Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue, Don’t Harass”

“I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are.”

– President Barack Obama, State of the Union, January 27, 2010

One sentence. Thirty short words, out of a total of 7077. That’s all Barack Obama spent on the 66,000 LGBTQ servicemembers in our armed forces who live daily in fear.

I want to remind everyone that the policy/law is actually titled, “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue, Don’t Harass.” Somehow, the military fogot about the last half of the title. Especially the don’t pursue part. DADT actually is responsible for an increase in discharges from the military; ironic, perhaps, as the law was supposed to offer some cover for gay men and women serving in the armed forces.

And this reminder, via Georgetown Law, as well:

“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is the only law in this country that authorizes the firing of an American simply for coming out as gay, lesbian, or bisexual.”

But, back to last night’s State of the Union.

On one hand, he included repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in the State of the Union. That’s a big deal. many worthy initiatives don’t make it into the SOTU, so, one could say we should be heartened.

On the other hand, it was thirty words. And he didn’t say when (except, “this year,) how (except, “I will work with Congress,”) or who was responsible. He didn’t offer invoking stop-loss, which would put a hold on any further discharges until the law is repealed. He didn’t demand it, as he did the jobs bill (granted, jobs are hugely important.)

Reaction has been mixed. From the LGBTQ community, most of my friends are skeptical. “I’ll believe it when I see it,” is the bottom-line reaction from most. One wrote on my Facebook page, “I don’t think congress is going to answer that call…” Another, “He has just repeated the same thing he has said for the past 2 years.”

My feelings echo David Mixner’s statement today:

“The reference to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ in a State of the Union message was no doubt a powerful and historic moment for the LGBT community. The community has succeeded in pushing this rock up the hill so that at last DADT is part of the national agenda. What I don’t understand is why the President continues to resist issuing a ’stop-loss’ order and end this practice now instead of a prolong and maybe never ending Congressional battle? What a moral high ground he would have spoken from last night if he announced a ’stop-loss’ order and then challenge Congress to meet his courage. The President has the power right this moment, beyond inspiration words, to create powerful change for this community. He once again decided not to use his Presidential powers and depend totally on Congress.”

Andrew Sullivan’s take:

“Bob Gates applauded the line. That’s the most encouraging sign in twenty years.”

I remain cautiously optimistic.

The President has effectively moved the ball into Congress’ court — he usual M.O. Will “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal be included in the Defense Department budget, as has been the expectation? Will Congress even answer the President’s call? John McCain, as I reported last night, has already said, “No.”

Our job now, as Lt. Dan Choi said last night, is to get to work to make repeal happen.

And as I said last night, “Game on!”











http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Wake me up when the democrats grow some balls and President Obama channels FDR instead of Jimmy Carter.



I'm sure this will piss off the Obama supporters but WTF that has never stopped me before. My grade for tonight's state of the union address was a C+. A nice speech but NOT enough fire in the belly to get things done and get them done NOW. If the dems lose their majority in both houses next November I can assure you that we will have zero chance of getting any of your agenda done Mr President. Maybe I missed it but I heard no urgency in tonight's speech and it seems that nothing will really go into effect until two or three years.
Compromise only works if you have people who are willing to participate in the process. Why continue Mr President with a obstructionist party that has nothing but contempt for you.The party of No doesn't have a shred of creditability and they will NEVER support you sir.
Also I was not impressed with "we are still working to end Don't Ask Don't Tell"
Hellooooooooooo, but you have the power to end discrimination with executive order or at the very least to stop the discharges until this issue is resolved.